I get your point, but from my perspective, consistent messiness often signals deeper management issues. Sure, some chaos is normal, but ongoing clutter usually means poor planning or oversight... and that rarely ends well in my experience.
I see where you're coming from, but sometimes messiness can just be a symptom of tight budgets or stretched resources rather than poor management. I've worked with builders who were messy but delivered solid results—maybe it's about balancing expectations and costs?
Had a similar experience recently—builder left the site messy daily, but the project finished ahead of schedule and under budget. Learned to pick my battles...sometimes neatness isn't worth the extra cost or delays if the work itself is solid.
Interesting perspective, but doesn't ongoing messiness raise some flags about overall workmanship or safety standards? I've found that sites kept tidy usually reflect attention to detail elsewhere—curious if you noticed any quality trade-offs in the finished build.
That's a fair point, but I've seen it go both ways. I've toured some pretty chaotic sites that ended up delivering impeccable finishes—surprisingly enough. On the flip side, I've also walked through spotless builds that later revealed some hidden shortcuts or sloppy wiring behind those pristine walls. Maybe it's less about messiness itself and more about the type of mess? Like, scattered tools and materials might just mean they're busy and focused, but piles of trash or obvious safety hazards... yeah, that's definitely a red flag.
Did you notice if the messiness was more cosmetic clutter or actual safety issues? Sometimes builders who are meticulous about structural integrity can still be a bit lax with tidying up at day's end. Not ideal, obviously, but maybe not always a direct reflection of their overall workmanship. Curious if anyone else has had similar experiences—messy site, great build, or vice versa?
