Totally get where you’re coming from. I’ve had similar experiences—clients love the look, but when the sensors start acting up or batteries die at the worst times, it’s a headache. Sometimes the low-tech route just saves everyone a lot of hassle.
Sometimes the low-tech route just saves everyone a lot of hassle.
Honestly, I couldn’t agree more. Sensor faucets look sleek, but I’ve had projects where they became a maintenance nightmare for clients. There’s something to be said for a classic lever—reliable, easy to clean, and you never have to worry about batteries. I get the appeal of touchless, but for high-traffic spaces or busy families, simple often wins out. Sometimes the “wow” factor just isn’t worth the ongoing headaches.
Couldn’t agree more with the “wow” factor not always being worth it. I’ve seen some gorgeous touchless fixtures in high-end homes, but when they glitch or need a reset, it’s just...frustrating. Do you think there’s a middle ground, like maybe a hybrid design? Sometimes I wonder if we’re overcomplicating things just for aesthetics.
Sometimes I wonder if we’re overcomplicating things just for aesthetics.
Honestly, I think you’re onto something. I’ve specified a few of those “wow” fixtures for clients, and the troubleshooting calls always come back to haunt me. There are hybrid models out there—manual with a sensor override—but even those can be finicky. Sometimes a good old lever just works better, even if it’s not as flashy. It’s like we’re trading reliability for bragging rights... not sure it’s worth it half the time.
It’s funny, I’ve had clients fall in love with those ultra-modern fixtures, only to get frustrated when the tech acts up. There’s a certain charm in simplicity—sometimes a classic lever just feels right, you know? But I get the appeal of something unique. Maybe it’s about finding that sweet spot between form and function... not always easy, but when it works, it really elevates the space.
