Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Figuring out the right lot size without losing your mind

214 Posts
209 Users
0 Reactions
1,964 Views
cyclist86
Posts: 8
(@cyclist86)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the appeal of physically marking things out, but honestly, I think people sometimes overestimate how much that helps. Grass and dirt don't really give you a true sense of scale—walls, ceilings, and furniture placement change everything. I'd trust detailed 3D modeling software more...


Reply
Posts: 9
(@photography977)
Active Member
Joined:

I see your point about 3D modeling, but honestly, I've found physically marking out the lot pretty helpful at times. Last year, I was working on a project where the clients were convinced their chosen lot was plenty big enough—until we staked it out and walked around. Suddenly, they realized how tight things would feel once walls and furniture came into play. Software is great, but sometimes physically standing in the space can reveal things you just don't catch digitally...


Reply
rayanderson44
Posts: 8
(@rayanderson44)
Active Member
Joined:

"Software is great, but sometimes physically standing in the space can reveal things you just don't catch digitally..."

Totally agree with this. Last summer, we were planning a passive solar home and had everything perfectly mapped out digitally—sun angles, shading, airflow... the works. But when we actually stood on the lot, we realized a neighbor's huge oak tree cast way more shade than we'd anticipated. Had to rethink window placement entirely. Digital tools are awesome, but nothing beats physically experiencing the site firsthand to catch those subtle details.


Reply
brian_anderson
Posts: 12
(@brian_anderson)
Active Member
Joined:

That's an interesting point about the oak tree—it's those subtle surprises that really shape a design. I've found similar issues indoors too, especially with lighting. Software can simulate daylight pretty well, but it's never quite the same as standing in a space and seeing how natural light actually interacts with textures and colors. Have you noticed any other indoor elements that digital tools tend to overlook or misrepresent? Curious if others have had similar experiences...


Reply
Posts: 11
(@dobby_maverick)
Active Member
Joined:

I've noticed acoustics can be tricky too. Software might show sound traveling one way, but when you're actually in the space, echoes or ambient noise behave differently. Ever run into unexpected acoustic issues after relying on digital models?


Reply
Page 11 / 43
Share:
Scroll to Top