Notifications
Clear all

Construction's done, now what—stick with builder's lender or shop around?

228 Posts
210 Users
0 Reactions
765 Views
Posts: 2
(@snorkeler81)
New Member
Joined:

"slightly more paperwork, but better rates and actual green incentives."

Yeah, the extra paperwork can feel tedious, but did you find the green incentives clearly outlined upfront, or was it something you had to dig into yourself? Glad it worked out for you either way.

Reply
marycamper
Posts: 3
(@marycamper)
New Member
Joined:

The green incentives usually aren't highlighted as clearly upfront as you'd hope. In my experience, lenders tend to emphasize their rates and general terms first, probably because that's what most people immediately ask about. The green incentives often require a bit more digging—checking through fine print or directly asking the lender for specifics. I'd suggest directly requesting a breakdown of these incentives early on, so you can factor them into your decision-making from the start.

"slightly more paperwork, but better rates and actual green incentives."

As far as paperwork goes, yes, it can feel overwhelming at first, but it's usually worth the effort if the financial benefits are significant enough. Just make sure you're clear on exactly what's required upfront to avoid surprises later.

Reply
law153
Posts: 7
(@law153)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally agree about the green incentives being buried in the fine print. When we built our place, I remember having to specifically ask about them multiple times before getting clear answers. It felt like lenders were surprised someone was actually interested in those details, haha.

One thing I'd add from experience is that builder-affiliated lenders sometimes have exclusive incentives or rebates tied directly to the builder's green certifications. We almost missed out on a pretty decent rebate because we initially overlooked the builder's lender, assuming we'd find better deals elsewhere. Turns out, their incentive package was specifically tailored to the energy-efficient features our builder had incorporated, and other lenders couldn't match it exactly.

That said, shopping around still paid off for us. Even though we ended up sticking with the builder's lender, having competing offers gave us leverage to negotiate slightly better terms. It wasn't a huge difference, but every bit counts when you're dealing with mortgages.

And yeah, the paperwork can be a headache—no argument there—but once you get through it, the long-term savings and knowing you're supporting sustainable building practices makes it worthwhile. Just keep a checklist handy and don't hesitate to ask questions if something seems unclear or overly complicated.

Reply
jamesd34
Posts: 3
(@jamesd34)
New Member
Joined:

Good points on the builder incentives, but I'd still caution folks to read carefully. I've seen builder lenders offer sweet deals upfront, then quietly pad fees elsewhere. Not saying they're all shady...just keep your eyes open and compare apples to apples.

Reply
natewalker709
Posts: 5
(@natewalker709)
Active Member
Joined:

That's a fair heads-up about hidden fees. I've noticed the same thing—some builder lenders do offer attractive initial terms but then sneak in extra costs later. A buddy of mine recently went with the builder's lender because of a super low rate upfront, only to find closing costs were way higher than expected. He still saved overall, but it wasn't the slam dunk he initially thought.

Makes me wonder though, aside from fees and rates, has anyone found customer service or responsiveness to be better with outside lenders versus builder-affiliated ones? Sometimes it's not just about the numbers...the experience matters too, especially if things get complicated or delayed. Curious if anyone's had noticeably better or worse experiences on that front.

Reply
Page 34 / 46
Share:
Scroll to Top