Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Finally cracked the code on keeping construction costs in check

571 Posts
513 Users
0 Reactions
10.6 K Views
jessicapainter
Posts: 14
(@jessicapainter)
Active Member
Joined:

You're spot-on about the hidden quirks—even the simplest ideas can surprise you down the road. Had a client once who went all-in on manual shades to avoid motor issues... then complained endlessly about tangled cords. No perfect solution, just informed trade-offs.


Reply
mcampbell27
Posts: 13
(@mcampbell27)
Active Member
Joined:

"No perfect solution, just informed trade-offs."

That's true, but have you considered cordless cellular shades? I've had clients hesitant about motors and cords alike, and cordless options often hit that sweet spot. Sure, they're not flawless—sometimes alignment can get tricky—but overall they're pretty user-friendly. Maybe it's less about accepting trade-offs and more about finding compromises that feel intuitive to the client... What do you think?


Reply
zeus_whiskers
Posts: 9
(@zeus_whiskers)
Active Member
Joined:

"Maybe it's less about accepting trade-offs and more about finding compromises that feel intuitive to the client..."

That's a great way to frame it. Reminds me of a recent build where the homeowners were dead-set against any kind of motorization (they'd had a bad experience before). We ended up going cordless cellular, and honestly, they loved it. Sure, alignment needed tweaking once or twice, but overall it was pretty smooth sailing. Sometimes the best solutions aren't perfect—they just feel right for the people involved.


Reply
Posts: 10
(@sphillips29)
Active Member
Joined:

That's a solid point about intuitive compromises. I've found that clients often have a gut feeling about what they want—even if they can't always articulate it clearly upfront. Had a similar scenario recently where the homeowners were convinced they needed premium hardwood flooring everywhere. Budget-wise, it was going to be tight, and honestly, in certain areas of the house, hardwood just didn't make practical sense.

We ended up suggesting engineered hardwood for main living spaces and high-quality laminate in secondary rooms. At first, they were skeptical (laminate has gotten a bad rap over the years), but once we showed them some samples and explained how far laminate has come in terms of durability and aesthetics, they warmed up to it. After installation, they genuinely couldn't tell the difference visually, and now they're thrilled with how much easier maintenance is in those rooms.

Sometimes it's less about convincing clients to accept trade-offs and more about guiding them toward options that align naturally with their priorities—even if those weren't their original ideas. People appreciate when you respect their instincts but also offer practical alternatives based on experience.

Anyway, glad your cordless cellular solution worked out. Motorization can be great when it works smoothly, but man...when it doesn't, it's a headache nobody wants to deal with.


Reply
josec16
Posts: 15
Topic starter
(@josec16)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally relate to your flooring anecdote—had a similar situation recently with kitchen countertops. The clients were dead set on quartz everywhere, but the budget was already stretched thin. We ended up mixing quartz for high-visibility areas and a solid-surface option for secondary spaces like laundry and pantry rooms. Honestly, once installed, the difference was barely noticeable...and the savings meant they could splurge a bit more on fixtures. Like you said, it's all about aligning practical experience with their gut feelings—makes a huge difference in their satisfaction down the road.


Reply
Page 78 / 115
Share:
Scroll to Top