Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Need advice on replacing an old leaky roof

1,070 Posts
944 Users
0 Reactions
16 K Views
Posts: 12
(@reader52)
Active Member
Joined:

Sometimes I worry about dead air pockets, especially in older homes with odd rooflines.

That’s a valid concern. In my experience, just relying on gable vents and turbines can be a bit risky, especially with complex roof geometry. I’ve actually seen situations where adding continuous ridge and soffit vents made a significant difference—helped avoid those stagnant spots you mentioned. Turbines are decent, but they don’t always create uniform airflow, particularly in houses with lots of valleys and dormers. Sometimes, it’s worth mapping out the attic airflow patterns before committing to a venting strategy.


Reply
charles_white
Posts: 8
(@charles_white)
Active Member
Joined:

Need Advice On Replacing An Old Leaky Roof

- Definitely agree about mapping airflow. I learned the hard way—my attic had a couple weird corners that just never got proper ventilation with only gable vents.
- Ended up adding a ridge vent and more soffit vents. Not cheap, but it actually dropped the attic temp by 10 degrees in summer.
- One thing I’d watch out for: sometimes contractors want to just throw in more turbines, but like you said, they don’t always help with dead spots.
- If you’re already replacing the roof, it’s probably worth spending a bit extra to get the venting right. Saves headaches down the road... and less mold risk, too.


Reply
Posts: 13
(@epaws57)
Active Member
Joined:

If you’re already replacing the roof, it’s probably worth spending a bit extra to get the venting right. Saves headaches down the road... and less mold risk, too.

That’s spot on. I always wonder though—did you consider any of the newer high-end venting systems? Some are pricier but claim even better airflow. Curious if anyone’s noticed a real-world difference or if it’s more marketing than substance.


Reply
running_ginger
Posts: 7
(@running_ginger)
Active Member
Joined:

Some are pricier but claim even better airflow. Curious if anyone’s noticed a real-world difference or if it’s more marketing than substance.

I’ve looked into a few of those “next-gen” venting systems, and honestly, I’m not totally convinced they’re always worth the premium. In theory, better airflow is great, but in practice, the basics—good soffit and ridge venting, proper insulation—seem to do most of the heavy lifting. I’ve seen homes with standard setups perform just as well as ones with the fancy baffles and proprietary vents.

That said, there are situations where the higher-end options make sense—like super low-slope roofs or complicated layouts where traditional venting just doesn’t cut it. But for a typical roof replacement? Sometimes it feels like you’re paying for branding more than a measurable performance boost. I’d rather see folks invest in airtightness and insulation before splurging on top-shelf vents... unless there’s a specific problem you’re solving for.


Reply
climbing935
Posts: 8
(@climbing935)
Active Member
Joined:

NEED ADVICE ON REPLACING AN OLD LEAKY ROOF

I hear you on the “premium vent” hype. I once got talked into a fancy system for my last place—cost a small fortune, and honestly, my attic didn’t feel any different than my neighbor’s with the basic setup. Maybe my expectations were too high, but it felt like buying designer jeans and realizing they fit just like regular ones. Unless your roof’s got some weird geometry or you’re fighting a specific issue, I’d stick with tried-and-true basics and put the extra cash toward insulation or better shingles. Sometimes simple really is smarter.


Reply
Page 79 / 214
Share:
Scroll to Top