Notifications
Clear all

Trimming down expenses on project supplies

189 Posts
182 Users
0 Reactions
616 Views
flee35
Posts: 4
(@flee35)
New Member
Joined:

Engineered wood is definitely easier on the sanity front, I'll give you that. But from a sustainability angle, it's not always as green as it seems. A lot depends on the adhesives and finishes used—some can off-gas VOCs for quite a while. If you're going engineered, look out for brands with solid environmental certifications like FSC or Greenguard.

I've been down the reclaimed brick road myself (pun intended), and yeah, mortar cleanup is no joke... but honestly, once you get into a rhythm, it's oddly therapeutic. Put on some tunes or a podcast, grab a cold drink, and it turns into kind of a zen thing—at least until your back starts complaining.

If you're still open to reclaimed materials without the hassle factor, salvaged tile might be worth exploring. Easier cleanup than bricks, minimal hidden surprises compared to old wood flooring—and you get the eco-friendly cred without losing your weekend completely. Just something else to consider...

Reply
cherylgenealogist
Posts: 4
(@cherylgenealogist)
New Member
Joined:

Totally agree on reclaimed tile—did our kitchen backsplash with some last year and cleanup was a breeze compared to bricks. Engineered wood can be tricky though...even FSC-certified stuff isn't always VOC-free, so it's worth double-checking product specs carefully.

Reply
fitness_james7807
Posts: 6
(@fitness_james7807)
Active Member
Joined:

"Engineered wood can be tricky though...even FSC-certified stuff isn't always VOC-free, so it's worth double-checking product specs carefully."

Yeah, good call on that. I learned the hard way when we did our flooring—thought FSC meant we were in the clear, but ended up airing out the house for days. Definitely pays to dig into those spec sheets and maybe even reach out to manufacturers directly if you're unsure. Glad your reclaimed tile worked out smoothly though; always nice when a DIY choice actually makes life easier!

Reply
coder94
Posts: 5
(@coder94)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, FSC can be a bit misleading if you're looking specifically at VOCs. I've found that checking for a CARB Phase 2 or TSCA Title VI compliance on engineered wood products usually gives a clearer picture about formaldehyde emissions. Learned that after a similar airing-out episode myself—windows wide open in February wasn't exactly fun, haha. Always worth taking that extra time to decode those spec sheets or even call the rep...better safe than chilly.

Reply
climber64
Posts: 6
(@climber64)
Active Member
Joined:

"Learned that after a similar airing-out episode myself—windows wide open in February wasn't exactly fun, haha."

Haha, been there myself... except it was mid-January and I was freezing my butt off. Totally agree with you about CARB Phase 2 and TSCA Title VI being clearer indicators. When I first started my build, I thought FSC meant I was good to go on emissions—rookie mistake. After some digging, I realized FSC is more about sustainability practices rather than VOC levels specifically.

For anyone else new to this, here's what worked for me: first, narrow down your product choices based on budget and availability. Then, double-check compliance labels like CARB or TSCA for formaldehyde emissions. Finally, if you're still unsure, just call the supplier directly and ask for the emissions test results. It feels a bit awkward at first, but trust me, suppliers get these questions all the time.

Good luck with your project—sounds like you're already on the right track!

Reply
Page 7 / 38
Share:
Scroll to Top