Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Making the switch to water-saving toilets: Worth it?

790 Posts
731 Users
0 Reactions
21.1 K Views
Posts: 0
(@news_waffles)
New Member
Joined:

- Ran into the same thing last year—swapped out an old American Standard for a fancy dual-flush.
- Water bill dropped, but I’ve had to unclog it more than I ever did with the old one.
- Parts aren’t as easy to find, either.
- For rentals or guest baths, maybe it’s fine, but in my main bath? I kinda miss the “set it and forget it” reliability of the old tanks.
- Guess it’s a trade-off, but sometimes I wonder if we’re overcomplicating a simple thing.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@baileyactivist)
New Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

Yeah, I get where you’re coming from. I swapped out a couple of old 3.5-gallon beasts for dual-flush models a few years back. Water bill definitely went down, but I’ve had to keep a plunger closer than I ever did before. There’s something to be said for the old “flush once and forget it” tanks. Still, I try to remind myself that every gallon saved adds up, especially in drought-prone areas. But yeah, the parts thing is real—tracking down a replacement seal for one of these newer models took me on a wild goose chase. Progress isn’t always as smooth as we hope, I guess.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@mochaswimmer7345)
Active Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

Yeah, the plunger thing is a real downside. I’ve noticed some of the early dual-flush models just don’t have the same “oomph” as the old tanks. But newer designs have gotten better—pressure-assisted toilets, for example, seem to handle clogs way less often. Parts can still be a pain, though. I guess it’s a tradeoff: a little more hassle for a lot less water use. If you’re in a drought-prone area, it’s probably worth the occasional inconvenience.


Reply
Posts: 17
(@sonicbiker112)
Active Member
Joined:

“a little more hassle for a lot less water use”

That’s pretty much it. I’ve specified a bunch of these for clients, and honestly, the newer models are way better than the old “flush twice and pray” versions. Still, if you’ve got a house full of teenagers, keep that plunger handy... just in case.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@reader45)
Active Member
Joined:

“the newer models are way better than the old ‘flush twice and pray’ versions”

I’ve gotta agree—technology’s come a long way since those first “eco” toilets that barely moved anything. I was super skeptical at first, since I’m always weighing the upfront cost versus the savings down the road. But after running the numbers, the water bill drops are actually noticeable, especially if you’ve got a crew at home.

Still, I hear you on the plunger thing. My kids seem to test the limits of every toilet we install, no matter how “high efficiency” it claims to be. But honestly, even with occasional clogs, I’d rather deal with that than pay for all that wasted water month after month.

If you’re on a tight budget, just make sure you’re not going for the absolute cheapest model out there—some of those still have the “flush and hope” problem. Spend a little more up front, and you’ll save more in the long run... at least that’s been my experience so far.


Reply
Page 127 / 158
Share:
Scroll to Top