Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Making the switch to water-saving toilets: Worth it?

771 Posts
715 Users
0 Reactions
12.9 K Views
Posts: 12
(@daisy_seeker)
Active Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

That’s a solid rundown. I’ll just add—if you’re on the fence, it’s totally normal to worry about clogs or flush strength. I’ve specified a bunch of these for clients, and honestly, the newer models are way better than the early ones. The trick is to pay attention to the MaP (Maximum Performance) rating. Anything over 800g is usually more than enough for a household, and you don’t have to sacrifice on style anymore either.

I get the nostalgia for the old-school flush, but the water savings really do add up, especially if you’ve got a bigger family or guests over a lot. And yeah, those rebates can be a game changer—sometimes they even cover installation.

One thing I’d watch out for: don’t skip checking your rough-in distance. I’ve seen people get excited about a sleek new toilet only to realize it doesn’t fit their plumbing. Not fun.

All in all, it’s a smart move. Once you get used to the quieter flush, you probably won’t miss that thunk as much as you think.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@barbarar87)
New Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

I’m with you on the MaP rating—didn’t even know that was a thing until I started researching for our build. Ended up going with a 1000g model just to be safe, and honestly, no regrets so far. I was a little skeptical about the flush power too, but it’s handled everything we’ve thrown at it (family of four, plus the occasional party). The water bill dropped more than I expected, which was a nice bonus.

One thing I’d add: double-check the seat height. Some of the “comfort height” models are great if you’re tall, but my partner finds them a bit awkward. Also, installation was straightforward, but I had to swap out the old supply line since the new one needed a different connector. Not a huge deal, just something to watch for.

Overall, I’d say it’s worth it, especially if you’re building or renovating anyway. The only thing I miss is the old handle style—these new buttons feel a bit flimsy, but maybe that’s just me being picky.


Reply
Posts: 10
(@jong74)
Active Member
Joined:

The only thing I miss is the old handle style—these new buttons feel a bit flimsy, but maybe that’s just me being picky.

Totally get you on the button thing. I keep waiting for one to snap off mid-flush, and then what? Also, not gonna lie, I still have nightmares about a “water-saving” toilet in a hotel that needed two flushes every time. So far, the higher MaP models seem to avoid that, but I’m keeping my plunger handy... just in case. Seat height is weirdly personal—tried one at my cousin’s and felt like a kid again.


Reply
Posts: 13
(@marley_blizzard)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve wondered if the button thing is just a design trend or if it’s actually cheaper to make. I’ve swapped out a couple of those dual-flush buttons and they always feel a bit plasticky compared to the old lever handles. Has anyone tried retrofitting a button model with a sturdier aftermarket part? Also, curious if anyone’s noticed a difference in flush reliability between brands—some seem to handle “real world” use better than others, but it’s hard to tell from specs alone.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@daisydavis266)
New Member
Joined:

I’ve swapped out a couple of those dual-flush buttons and they always feel a bit plasticky compared to the old lever handles.

- The button mechanism is definitely a cost-saving move for most manufacturers. Injection-molded plastic is cheaper than metal levers, and it’s easier to standardize for global markets.
- I’ve tried swapping out the stock buttons for aftermarket ones—there are a few metal options out there, but honestly, most are just “metal-look” plastic. True solid metal is rare and usually doesn’t fit perfectly unless you’re willing to tinker.
- In terms of reliability, I’ve noticed that brands like Toto and Caroma tend to have more robust internal mechanisms. The buttons still feel light, but the flush valves and seals last longer. Some of the off-brand models I’ve installed have had issues with sticking or inconsistent flushes after a year or two.
- Specs don’t tell the whole story. I’ve seen toilets with similar GPF ratings perform very differently in real-world use, especially with older plumbing or hard water.
- If you’re after durability, sometimes sticking with a high-quality lever model (even if it’s single-flush) can be less hassle long-term, unless you’re really chasing every last drop of water savings.

Honestly, I wish more companies would offer a premium button option—there’s definitely a market for it.


Reply
Page 86 / 155
Share:
Scroll to Top