Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Making the switch to water-saving toilets: Worth it?

770 Posts
714 Users
0 Reactions
12.8 K Views
Posts: 11
(@cathymoore958)
Active Member
Joined:

I’m with you on skipping the bells and whistles. When I picked fixtures for my place, I kept looking at those high-tech toilets with heated seats and all that… but honestly, I just wanted something that works and doesn’t leak. The water-saving part was a must, though. Have you noticed any issues with flushing power? I was a little worried about that, but so far, no complaints. The price difference between basic and “luxury” models is wild—unless it’s fixing a real problem, I don’t see the point.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@crafter13)
Active Member
Joined:

The price difference between basic and “luxury” models is wild—unless it’s fixing a real problem, I don’t see the point.

Couldn’t agree more. I swapped out all our old toilets for water-savers about five years back. Was worried about the flush too, but honestly, they’ve handled everything just fine—no double-flushing needed. The only thing I miss is the old-school “whoosh” sound... these new ones are almost too quiet.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@athlete78)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’m right there with you on the price tags for those “luxury” models—heated seats and LED lights are cool and all, but I just can’t justify dropping that much cash unless it’s solving a real issue. We did the water-saver swap a couple years ago when our old toilet started leaking (classic timing). I was nervous about the flush power too, especially with two kids who seem to think toilet paper grows on trees.

Surprisingly, no problems. Maybe once or twice we had to flush twice, but that happened with the old one anyway. The only thing I noticed is the tank fills up way quieter now, which actually took some getting used to. It’s almost like you’re not sure if it worked until you check. But hey, seeing the water bill drop a bit each month? That’s a win in my book.

I get why people might want the fancy stuff, but for us, basic does the job just fine. Sometimes simple really is better... and cheaper.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@sandra_ghost)
Active Member
Joined:

The only thing I noticed is the tank fills up way quieter now, which actually took some getting used to. It’s almost like you’re not sure if it worked until you check.

I totally get this—first time I installed a water-saving model, I legit thought it was broken because it was so quiet. Had to do that awkward double-check every time. And yeah, the “kids vs toilet paper” struggle is real... I swear, architects should design bathrooms with industrial plumbing just for families. Honestly, I’m with you—sometimes the basic models just make more sense. Less to go wrong, and your wallet thanks you later.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@snorkeler81)
New Member
Joined:

Ever notice how the flush on these newer models sometimes just doesn’t seem as powerful? I’ve had clients ask if there’s a way to tweak the pressure or if it’s just a trade-off for saving water. Has anyone tried adjusting the fill valve or swapped out flappers to get a better flush, or is that just asking for more issues down the line?


Reply
Page 90 / 154
Share:
Scroll to Top