Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
What’s a “normal” l...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What’s a “normal” length for construction loans these days?

511 Posts
482 Users
0 Reactions
15.6 K Views
Posts: 13
(@nancygamerdev)
Active Member
Joined:

What’s A “Normal” Length For Construction Loans These Days?

Yeah, 12 months is what I keep running into too, and it’s honestly a bit unrealistic for most projects. Even when you’ve got your ducks in a row, there’s always something—inspections get delayed, or a supplier flakes out. I’ve tried arguing for 15 or 18 months, but lenders just get cagey. It’s frustrating, but you’re not wrong to push back. Sometimes you just have to stand your ground and hope they see reason.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@metalworker351812)
New Member
Joined:

What’s A “Normal” Length For Construction Loans These Days?

Twelve months always seems to be the magic number on paper, but in reality? I’ve never had a build wrap up that neatly. My last project was supposed to be “simple”—just a single-story addition. Ended up taking 16 months because the city decided to change their inspection schedule halfway through, and then the windows I ordered got stuck in transit for weeks. I tried to get the lender to budge on the timeline, but they acted like I was asking for the moon.

I get why banks want to keep things tight, but it’s like they’ve never actually seen a construction site. Stuff happens. Weather, backorders, even just waiting for a subcontractor to show up can eat up weeks. I’ve started padding my timelines when I talk to lenders, just to give myself a fighting chance. Sometimes they’ll meet me halfway, sometimes not, but I’d rather be upfront than scrambling for an extension later.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@aviation_toby)
Active Member
Joined:

I get why banks want to keep things tight, but it’s like they’ve never actually seen a construction site. Stuff happens. Weather, backorders, even just waiting for a subcontractor to show up can eat up weeks.

I’m right there with you. On paper, everything’s supposed to be neat and tidy—12 months, maybe a little wiggle room if you’re lucky. But real life doesn’t play by those rules. I’m building my first custom house right now, and the loan is for 12 months, but I’ve already had a couple of “are we really gonna finish in time?” moments and we’re only halfway through.

What gets me is the banks act like delays are some rare freak occurrence. Like, have they ever actually tried to get a plumber to show up on the day he says he will? Or dealt with a city inspector who’s “out sick” for a week? I tried asking my lender if we could just set the loan term at 15 months from the start, since I’d heard horror stories about extensions being a pain, and they basically said it was 12 months or nothing. Maybe some lenders do things differently, but from what I’ve seen, they’re not very flexible.

I do wonder if it depends on where you are, though. Out here (Pacific Northwest), weather is a wildcard and everyone seems to be perpetually behind schedule. Maybe in other regions things run smoother? Not sure.

Anyway, I’m padding everything now too—even my builder tells me to expect delays. The only thing that worries me is if you pad your timeline too much, do lenders start looking at you like you don’t know what you’re doing? Or maybe they think your project is riskier than it really is? I just don’t want to make it harder to get approved by being too “realistic.”

Curious if anyone’s ever had a lender actually agree to more than 12 months up front—or is that just wishful thinking?


Reply
Posts: 8
(@gseeker59)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, 12 months is pretty much the standard I see, but it’s rarely enough time—especially if you’re dealing with weather like we get up here. I’ve had a couple lenders offer 18 months on bigger projects, but that’s usually for multi-unit stuff, not single-family. Extensions are always a hassle and they love to tack on fees. I wouldn’t stress too much about asking for extra time upfront; in my experience, as long as your builder’s schedule looks reasonable, most lenders won’t ding you for being realistic. They just want to know you’ve thought things through.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@michelleexplorer)
New Member
Joined:

Extensions are always a hassle and they love to tack on fees.

Yeah, those extension fees are sneaky. I thought 12 months would be plenty for our build, but between rain delays and permit stuff dragging out, we barely made it. If I could do it over, I'd ask for more time upfront—felt weird at first, but honestly, nobody blinked. Lenders seem to expect things to go sideways sometimes.


Reply
Page 6 / 103
Share:
Scroll to Top