Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

Making the switch to water-saving toilets: Worth it?

790 Posts
731 Users
0 Reactions
25 K Views
Posts: 5
(@david_fluffy)
Active Member
Joined:

“there were a couple of hiccups at first—mostly with the cheaper models. But after switching brands, the issues pretty much disappeared.”

That lines up with what I’ve seen, too. The model and install make a huge difference. There’s a lot of talk about “eco” toilets being a pain, but honestly, if you go for a reputable brand and make sure it’s set up right, most of those horror stories don’t really hold up. I’ve swapped out a bunch in older homes and apartment buildings, and once you get past the learning curve (and avoid the bargain-bin units), things run pretty smooth.

One thing I’d add—if you’re worried about double-flushing, look for models with a good MaP score (that’s the flush performance rating). Some of the newer designs are actually better than old-school ones at clearing the bowl. And yeah, the water savings aren’t always dramatic in single-family homes, but over time it does add up... especially if you’ve got a few people under one roof.

All in all, it’s worth it as long as you don’t cheap out on the hardware.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@vr_jack2292)
Active Member
Joined:

- Agree on the install—if it’s not done right, even the best model can be a headache.
- I’ve had guests in my place who didn’t even notice the switch to low-flow, so the “bad flush” thing is overblown if you pick a solid brand.
- For higher-end homes, I’d say go for Toto or Kohler. They look good and work reliably. The cheap stuff just isn’t worth the hassle.
- Water savings aren’t huge per flush, but with multiple bathrooms and regular use, it adds up over a year.
- Only real downside: some models are noisier than old-school ones. Not a dealbreaker, but worth noting if you’re picky about that kind of thing.


Reply
Posts: 17
(@surfing928)
Active Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

Totally agree about install being everything—had a plumber rush one of mine and it was a nightmare. Ended up with leaks and a wobbly base, which is not what you want in a powder room that’s supposed to impress. If you’re going for that luxury feel, I’d say don’t skimp on the pro who does the work.

On brands, I’m with you—Toto’s been flawless for me. The flush is quiet enough for late-night use, and honestly, guests never notice anything different. I do think the “bad flush” rep comes from those bargain models or really old designs. If you’re outfitting a high-end space, it’s worth paying extra for something that looks sharp and works every time.

One thing I’d add: if you’re doing a full reno, consider wall-mounted models. They free up floor space and look super sleek, though they’re pricier to install. Also, some of the newer smart toilets have features like heated seats or bidet functions—definitely not essential, but they do add that wow factor.

Noise-wise, yeah, some are louder than others. If your bathrooms are near bedrooms or living spaces, it’s worth testing them out in person if you can. Nothing kills the vibe like a jet-engine flush during a dinner party...


Reply
Posts: 13
(@julie_wood)
Active Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

Can’t argue with the install point—seen too many “high-end” bathrooms ruined by a cheap or rushed job. But I’ll push back a bit on the wall-mounted models. They look great, sure, but if you ever need to service them, it’s a pain and can get pricey fast. Also, not every wall is up for the extra plumbing and bracing. As for smart toilets, I’ve had clients love them, but I’ve also had folks regret the extra bells and whistles when something inevitably needs fixing. Water-saving is worth it, but only if you’re not sacrificing reliability for a fancy feature list.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@barbaraskater)
Active Member
Joined:

MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?

You’re spot on about the install—no matter how much you spend on fixtures, a bad install will haunt you. I’ve seen more than one “luxury” bathroom where the toilet’s the weak link, either because someone cut corners or didn’t plan for the right support.

On wall-mounted toilets, I get the appeal. They look sleek and save space, but you’re right: retrofitting them into an older home can be a headache. Not every wall is up to the task, and reinforcing can mean opening up more than you bargained for. Plus, if there’s ever a leak or mechanical issue, you’re not just popping off a tank lid—you might be cutting into tile or drywall. That’s not something most folks want to deal with down the line.

Smart toilets are another beast. Some of my clients love all the features—heated seats, bidet functions, even night lights—but when those electronics go out, repairs aren’t cheap or quick. And honestly, sometimes simpler is better. I’ve had people ask me to swap out their “smart” model for a basic dual-flush after a couple years of frustration.

But water-saving? That’s one upgrade I rarely see anyone regret. The tech has come a long way since those early low-flow models that needed two flushes to do the job (which kind of defeated the purpose). These days, most reputable brands have figured out how to balance efficiency and performance. Just make sure you’re picking something with good reviews for reliability and flushing power—don’t just go by gallons per flush numbers alone.

If you’re doing a full reno anyway, it’s worth considering rough-in changes for future flexibility. But if you’re just swapping out fixtures, stick with tried-and-true floor mounts unless you really want that floating look and are ready for extra work (and cost).

Long story short: water-saving is worth it, but don’t let style or gadgets override practicality. A reliable toilet that saves water will pay off in peace of mind—and your water bill—without turning into a maintenance project every year.


Reply
Page 129 / 158
Share:
Scroll to Top