Making The Switch To Water-Saving Toilets: Worth It?
Funny, I actually went for the touchless option in our last remodel and haven’t had any major issues. I get what you mean about them seeming overcomplicated, but honestly, it’s been convenient—especially with little kids around. I do miss the “flush power” of older models, though. Anyone else feel like the really sleek, high-end toilets sometimes sacrifice function for looks? I’m all for saving water, but sometimes I wonder if we’re trading off a bit too much for style...
MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?
I’ve noticed the same thing with some of the newer models—really sleek design, but sometimes you end up needing to flush twice, especially with the ultra-low flow ones. I get the appeal of touchless, and it’s definitely more hygienic, but I do wonder if some manufacturers are prioritizing aesthetics over actual flushing efficiency. In my last renovation, I went with a dual-flush system that’s supposed to balance water savings and performance. It’s decent, but honestly, it still doesn’t match the old-school gravity flushers for sheer power.
One thing I did find is that regular maintenance makes a big difference. Even a little mineral buildup can mess with the flush, especially on these newer models. I guess it’s a trade-off—less water use, but maybe a bit more upkeep and an occasional double-flush. Still, with water bills creeping up, it feels like a worthwhile compromise... most days, anyway.
MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?
Honestly, I’ve lost count of how many water-saving toilets I’ve installed in the last few years. Some of them are great, others… not so much. It’s true—those ultra-low flow models can be hit or miss. I remember one job where the client insisted on the absolute lowest-flow unit on the market. Looked amazing, but we were back there a month later because it just couldn’t handle, well, real life use. Ended up swapping it for a dual-flush, which is a decent middle ground.
You’re spot on about maintenance. I tell folks all the time—hard water buildup is no joke, especially with these newer designs. If you don’t stay on top of it, even the best toilet will start acting up. Personally, I’d take a slightly higher water bill over the hassle of multiple flushes, but that’s just me. Still, if you pick the right model and keep it clean, you can get the savings without too much compromise. Just don’t expect every “eco” toilet to work like the old tanks did... they’re a different beast.
MAKING THE SWITCH TO WATER-SAVING TOILETS: WORTH IT?
I’ve tried a few of the “fancy” low-flow models in some high-end remodels. Honestly, some of them feel like you’re playing roulette—either it works perfectly or you’re left flushing twice. Dual-flush seems like the safest bet, especially if you want to avoid awkward guest situations. I’ll take reliable over ultra-eco any day, but I do appreciate the water savings when it actually works as advertised.
Honestly, some of them feel like you’re playing roulette—either it works perfectly or you’re left flushing twice.
That’s been my experience too, especially with some of the earlier low-flow models. I remember installing one in a client’s guest bath a few years back—looked great, promised all the water savings, but you had to cross your fingers every time you used it. Not ideal when you’ve got a house full of people.
Lately though, I’ve noticed the newer dual-flush options are a lot more reliable. The trick seems to be going with a reputable brand and, if possible, actually testing the flush before committing. I know it sounds weird, but I’ve literally filled a few with colored water at the showroom just to see if they do the job.
I get the hesitation about going “ultra-eco” if it means awkward moments for guests. But when you land on a good model, the water bill difference is real. Plus, in some areas, there are rebates or incentives that make the switch a bit less painful on the wallet. Still, I’d never recommend one I haven’t tried myself first.
