Just watch out for easements or weird setbacks—sometimes that’s why they were skipped over in the first place.
That’s so true. I’ve seen folks get super excited about a “bargain” lot, only to find out half of it is basically off-limits because of utility easements or some ancient drainage thing nobody told them about. Sometimes you can work around it, but other times it just kills the project.
One thing I’ve noticed is that lots with mature trees or existing vegetation can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, you save on landscaping and get instant shade (which is awesome for energy efficiency), but clearing can get pricey if you have to take down big stuff. I’m always torn between preserving as much as possible and making room for solar orientation.
Curious if anyone here has lucked out with infill lots? I’ve heard stories where someone found a tiny, odd-shaped lot and built a super-efficient little house that ended up being the envy of the block. Wondering if those are unicorns or actually out there if you dig deep enough...
INFILL LOTS: HIDDEN TREASURE OR TOO MUCH HASSLE?
I’ve actually toured a couple of those weird leftover lots—one was shaped almost like a triangle wedged between two old houses. I almost went for it, but the setbacks made the buildable area so tiny it just wasn’t practical for what I wanted. Still, I’ve seen some creative builds on those oddball parcels. If you’re flexible with design and don’t mind a little extra legwork, I think they’re out there. But the extra due diligence is no joke. Has anyone managed to keep costs down on tree removal or grading? That part always seems to balloon the budget for me.
LOOKING FOR AFFORDABLE LAND—ANY HIDDEN GEMS?
Tree removal and grading costs can sneak up fast, I hear you. What’s worked for me is getting quotes from smaller, local crews instead of the big companies—sometimes they’ll work with you on price, especially if you’re not in a rush. Also, if you can handle some of the brush clearing yourself, it helps. I’ve found that being upfront about your budget sometimes gets folks to suggest cheaper alternatives, like leaving a few trees if they’re not in the way. It’s definitely more legwork, but it can pay off.
I’ve found that being upfront about your budget sometimes gets folks to suggest cheaper alternatives, like leaving a few trees if they’re not in the way.
That’s been my experience too—transparency goes a long way. I’d add that sometimes, the “hidden gems” aren’t just about the land itself but the timing. I lucked into a parcel last year because the seller was motivated to close before winter, so don’t overlook listings that have been sitting for a while. They might be more negotiable than you’d think.
On the tree removal front, I’ve actually kept a few mature trees intentionally. Not only does it save on costs, but they can add character and shade, which is a bonus down the line. One thing I learned the hard way: always check for local ordinances or conservation rules before you start clearing. Some areas are stricter than others, and fines can really eat into your budget.
If you’re open to land that needs a little TLC, sometimes those “rougher” lots end up being the most rewarding. It’s more work, but there’s something satisfying about shaping a place from the ground up.
Hidden Gems Come with Surprises
- Agree on the timing point—sometimes the best deals are on listings everyone else has overlooked.
- Keeping mature trees is a smart move, but I’ll be honest, it can complicate building layouts. Not always a bad thing, just something to factor in if you want to maximize sun or views.
- You’re spot on with ordinances; I’ve seen projects get stalled for months over tree removal rules no one mentioned up front. Double-checking saves headaches.
- “Rough” lots can be rewarding, but they’re also unpredictable. I’ve had clients discover old wells or debris that cost more than expected to deal with... Still, shaping raw land can be worth the hassle if you go in eyes open.
