Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about our forum!

v1.0.0
What’s a “normal” l...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What’s a “normal” length for construction loans these days?

244 Posts
235 Users
0 Reactions
2,410 Views
Posts: 11
(@miloc50)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s frustrating when you do everything right and still get caught up in red tape.

Tell me about it. Even when you try to plan for every possible delay, there’s always some new hoop to jump through. Permits, weather, supply chain—take your pick. I’ve noticed lenders are even less flexible if you’re pushing for green upgrades, too. It’s like, “Sure, be sustainable... just do it in 12 months or less.” Makes you wonder if anyone on the lending side has actually tried to build something lately.


Reply
charles_stone
Posts: 12
(@charles_stone)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: What’s A “Normal” Length For Construction Loans These Days?

You’re not wrong—trying to squeeze a build with green features into a standard 12-month window is just asking for headaches. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve had to explain to lenders that, no, you can’t just swap in a heat pump or solar panels at the last minute and expect everything to stay on schedule. It’s like the folks writing the loan terms are living in some alternate reality where weather delays and backordered materials don’t exist.

Honestly, I wish there was more flexibility baked in for projects that are actually trying to do things better, not just faster. The irony is, those sustainable upgrades usually mean more coordination and sometimes longer lead times, but the financing side doesn’t seem to care. I’ve had projects where we had to rush decisions or cut corners just to hit a lender’s arbitrary deadline, which kind of defeats the purpose of building responsibly.

That said, I have seen a couple lenders start to offer 18-month construction loans, especially if you can show them a detailed schedule with realistic contingencies. It’s not super common yet, but it’s out there if you dig around. Still, it feels like you have to jump through extra hoops just to get what should be standard flexibility.

Permitting is another wild card—sometimes it feels like you’re waiting longer for a stamp than you are for actual construction. Had a project last year where the city sat on our permit for four months because they “lost” a form. No amount of planning could have prepared us for that one.

I guess the only silver lining is that more people are starting to call this stuff out. Maybe if enough of us keep pushing back, we’ll see some changes... eventually. Until then, just gotta keep rolling with the punches and hope your lender has at least a little bit of real-world experience.


Reply
jfrost41
Posts: 9
(@jfrost41)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s wild how lenders still act like every project is just a cookie-cutter box that pops up in a year, no matter what you’re building. The 12-month thing feels like it was set in stone back when “sustainable” meant slapping on some extra insulation. I’ve had to basically create a mini-novel of schedules and backup plans to get anyone to even consider a longer loan term, and half the time they look at me like I’m speaking another language.

Permitting is the real comedy, though. I once had a city inspector “misplace” our plans and then blame us for not submitting them… which basically meant we lost an entire season. And trying to explain to a lender why you need three extra months because your triple-glazed windows are stuck on a boat somewhere? Good luck.

I keep hoping the more we push for better building practices, the more the financing side will catch up. Right now, it feels like we’re all just duct-taping the timeline together and crossing our fingers. Maybe someday “normal” will actually mean realistic.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@anthonyfurry588)
Active Member
Joined:

Right now, it feels like we’re all just duct-taping the timeline together and crossing our fingers.

That’s exactly how it felt for us—like we were just patching things up and hoping nothing fell apart. I kept thinking, if lenders actually visited a job site mid-build, they’d see how unpredictable things get. I mean, is anyone actually finishing a custom build in 12 months anymore? Or is that just some fantasy number they keep recycling? Curious if anyone’s managed to get a lender to budge on the timeline without writing a “mini-novel” of justifications...


Reply
jmaverick29
Posts: 5
(@jmaverick29)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, 12 months feels like wishful thinking these days. Last year, we had a build drag out to 16 months because of weather delays and a window order that took forever. I’ve seen some lenders offer 18-month terms, but it’s always a hassle to get them to agree. Has anyone actually gotten a lender to visit the site and see why the schedule slips? Or do they just stick to their spreadsheets?


Reply
Page 18 / 49
Share:
Scroll to Top